linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] perf test: Pass the verbose option to shell tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAP-5=fUtE_9=dYaazUJYzDGz2+nGcWjJoCxGb6b5oSbU6Z02AQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:17:21 -0700
From:   Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] perf test: Pass the verbose option to shell tests

On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 10:54 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Em Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 02:45:51PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 02:56:46PM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> > > Having a verbose option will allow shell tests to provide extra failure
> > > details when the fail or skip.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> > > ---
> > >  tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c | 7 +++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
> > > index cbbfe48ab802..e1ed60567b2f 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
> > > @@ -577,10 +577,13 @@ struct shell_test {
> > >  static int shell_test__run(struct test *test, int subdir __maybe_unused)
> > >  {
> > >     int err;
> > > -   char script[PATH_MAX];
> > > +   char script[PATH_MAX + 3];
> >
> > This looks strange, i.e. if it is a _path_ _MAX_, why add 3 chars past
> > that max when generating a _path_? I'll drop the above hunk and keep the
> > rest, ok?
>
> Oh well, its not a path after all, its something that is passed to
> system(), the use of PATH_MAX seems arbitrary, so your patch wasn't
> wrong, but since it is arbitrary, I'll keep it at PATH_MAX and reduce
> the patch size 8-)
>
> - Arnaldo

Works for me. Thanks,

Ian

> > >     struct shell_test *st = test->priv;
> > >
> > > -   path__join(script, sizeof(script), st->dir, st->file);
> > > +   path__join(script, sizeof(script) - 3, st->dir, st->file);
> > > +
> > > +   if (verbose)
> > > +           strncat(script, " -v", sizeof(script) - strlen(script) - 1);
> > >
> > >     err = system(script);
> > >     if (!err)
>
> --
>
> - Arnaldo