[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <73A33E4D-2D7C-4B79-80EB-952E7B754655@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 20:02:39 +0000
From: "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Kan Liang" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V3 00/66] x86/fpu: Spring cleaning and PKRU sanitizing
On Jun 21, 2021, at 15:22, Bae, Chang Seok <chang.seok.bae@...el.com> wrote:
> I tried to apply AMX patches on top of this. The test looks to be okay by far.
> I will also give an update here if I find anything.
This looks to be vague about the test. I took cases shown in AMX v5 like this:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210523193259.26200-24-chang.seok.bae@intel.com/
It validates AMX state with context switches, signal delivery/return, and
context injection via ptrace.
Thanks,
Chang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists