[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YNJsar/EYmCeTO3S@atmark-techno.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 08:04:10 +0900
From: 'Dominique MARTINET' <dominique.martinet@...ark-techno.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nok.org>
Cc: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@...sung.com>,
'Jianxiong Gao' <jxgao@...gle.com>,
'Christoph Hellwig' <hch@....de>,
'Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk' <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
'Linus Torvalds' <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
'Horia Geantă' <horia.geanta@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 'Lukas Hartmann' <lukas@...mn.com>,
'Aymen Sghaier' <aymen.sghaier@....com>,
'Herbert Xu' <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"'David S. Miller'" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
'Marc Orr' <marcorr@...gle.com>,
'Erdem Aktas' <erdemaktas@...gle.com>,
'Peter Gonda' <pgonda@...gle.com>,
'Bumyong Lee' <bumyong.lee@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: swiotlb/caamjr regression (Was: [GIT PULL] (swiotlb)
stable/for-linus-5.12)
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote on Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 05:58:14PM -0400:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 04:48:24PM +0900, 'Dominique MARTINET' wrote:
> > Thanks, that should be good.
> >
> > Do you want me to send a follow-up patch with the two extra checks
> > (tlb_addr & (IO_TLB_SIZE -1)) > swiotlb_align_offset(dev, orig_addr)
> > tlb_offset < alloc_size
> >
> > or are we certain this can't ever happen?
>
> I would love more patches and I saw the previous one you posted.
>
> But we only got two (or one) weeks before the next merge window opens
> so I am sending to Linus the one that was tested with NVMe and crypto
> (see above).
>
> That is the
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/swiotlb.git/commit/?h=stable/for-linus-5.14
>
> And then after Linus releases the 5.14 - I would love to take your
> cleanup on top of that and test it?
That sounds good to me, will send with proper formatting after release.
--
Dominique
Powered by blists - more mailing lists