[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YNGBJRRWBql413nM@unreal>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 09:20:21 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Avihai Horon <avihaih@...dia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>,
Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Honggang LI <honli@...hat.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 rdma-next] RDMA/mlx5: Enable Relaxed Ordering by
default for kernel ULPs
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 08:18:37PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 10:20:33PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 03:02:05PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > Someone is working on dis-entangling the access flags? It took a long
> > > time to sort out that this mess in wr.c actually does have a
> > > distinct user/kernel call chain too..
> >
> > I'd love to see it done, but I won't find time for it anytime soon.
>
> Heh, me too..
>
> I did actually once try to get a start on doing something to wr.c but
> it rapidly started to get into mire..
>
> I thought I recalled Leon saying he or Avihai would work on the ACCESS
> thing anyhow?
Yes, we are planning to do it for the next cycle.
Thanks
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists