linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the soundwire tree with the sound-asoc-fixes tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:19:36 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the soundwire tree with the
 sound-asoc-fixes tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the soundwire tree got a conflict in:

  include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h

between commit:

  d38ebaf2c884 ("soundwire: export sdw_update() and sdw_update_no_pm()")

from the sound-asoc-fixes tree and commit:

  031e668bc1ad ("soundwire: bus: Make sdw_nwrite() data pointer argument const")

from the soundwire tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h
index de9802a24e7e,ddbeb00799e4..000000000000
--- a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h
+++ b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h
@@@ -1040,10 -1039,7 +1039,10 @@@ int sdw_write(struct sdw_slave *slave, 
  int sdw_write_no_pm(struct sdw_slave *slave, u32 addr, u8 value);
  int sdw_read_no_pm(struct sdw_slave *slave, u32 addr);
  int sdw_nread(struct sdw_slave *slave, u32 addr, size_t count, u8 *val);
- int sdw_nwrite(struct sdw_slave *slave, u32 addr, size_t count, u8 *val);
+ int sdw_nwrite(struct sdw_slave *slave, u32 addr, size_t count, const u8 *val);
 +int sdw_update(struct sdw_slave *slave, u32 addr, u8 mask, u8 val);
 +int sdw_update_no_pm(struct sdw_slave *slave, u32 addr, u8 mask, u8 val);
 +
  int sdw_compare_devid(struct sdw_slave *slave, struct sdw_slave_id id);
  void sdw_extract_slave_id(struct sdw_bus *bus, u64 addr, struct sdw_slave_id *id);
  

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped