linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] rpmsg: ctrl: Introduce new RPMSG_CREATE/RELEASE_DEV

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 22 Jun 2021 09:43:49 +0200
From:   Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>
To:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
CC:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
        <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] rpmsg: ctrl: Introduce new
 RPMSG_CREATE/RELEASE_DEV_IOCTL controls

Hi Mathieu

On 6/22/21 1:16 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 02:58:00PM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
>> Allow the user space application to create and release an rpmsg device
>> by adding RPMSG_CREATE_DEV_IOCTL and RPMSG_RELEASE_DEV_IOCTL ioctrls to
>> the /dev/rpmsg_ctrl interface
>>
>> The RPMSG_CREATE_DEV_IOCTL Ioctl can be used to instantiate a local rpmsg
>> device.
>> Depending on the back-end implementation, the associated rpmsg driver is
>> probed and a NS announcement can be sent to the remote processor.
>>
>> The RPMSG_RELEASE_DEV_IOCTL allows the user application to release a
>> rpmsg device created either by the remote processor or with the
>> RPMSG_CREATE_DEV_IOCTL call.
>> Depending on the back-end implementation, the associated rpmsg driver is
>> removed and a NS destroy rpmsg can be sent to the remote processor.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ctrl.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>  include/uapi/linux/rpmsg.h | 10 ++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ctrl.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ctrl.c
>> index eeb1708548c1..cb19e32d05e1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ctrl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ctrl.c
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>>  #include <uapi/linux/rpmsg.h>
>>  
>>  #include "rpmsg_char.h"
>> +#include "rpmsg_internal.h"
>>  
>>  static dev_t rpmsg_major;
>>  
>> @@ -37,11 +38,13 @@ static DEFINE_IDA(rpmsg_minor_ida);
>>   * @rpdev:	underlaying rpmsg device
>>   * @cdev:	cdev for the ctrl device
>>   * @dev:	device for the ctrl device
>> + * @ctrl_lock:	serialize the ioctrls.
>>   */
>>  struct rpmsg_ctrldev {
>>  	struct rpmsg_device *rpdev;
>>  	struct cdev cdev;
>>  	struct device dev;
>> +	struct mutex ctrl_lock;
>>  };
>>  
>>  static int rpmsg_ctrldev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>> @@ -70,9 +73,8 @@ static long rpmsg_ctrldev_ioctl(struct file *fp, unsigned int cmd,
>>  	void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg;
>>  	struct rpmsg_endpoint_info eptinfo;
>>  	struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo;
>> -
>> -	if (cmd != RPMSG_CREATE_EPT_IOCTL)
>> -		return -EINVAL;
>> +	struct rpmsg_device *rpdev;
>> +	int ret = 0;
>>  
>>  	if (copy_from_user(&eptinfo, argp, sizeof(eptinfo)))
>>  		return -EFAULT;
>> @@ -82,7 +84,33 @@ static long rpmsg_ctrldev_ioctl(struct file *fp, unsigned int cmd,
>>  	chinfo.src = eptinfo.src;
>>  	chinfo.dst = eptinfo.dst;
>>  
>> -	return rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_create(ctrldev->rpdev, &ctrldev->dev, chinfo);
>> +	mutex_lock(&ctrldev->ctrl_lock);
> 
> Have you been able to verify the VFS layer doesn't take care of serializing
> ioctl() and file accesses in general?  I did a quick search in the drivers/
> directory and the vast majority of implementations don't use a lock.

Please find my answer here https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/21/235
I tested by suppressing the lock and adding msleep to check a potential atomic.
in the rpmsg_ctrldev_ioctl function. Nothing seems prevent the re-entrance.

Regards,
Arnaud

> 
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
> 
>> +	switch (cmd) {
>> +	case RPMSG_CREATE_EPT_IOCTL:
>> +		ret = rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_create(ctrldev->rpdev, &ctrldev->dev, chinfo);
>> +		break;
>> +
>> +	case RPMSG_CREATE_DEV_IOCTL:
>> +		rpdev = rpmsg_create_channel(ctrldev->rpdev, &chinfo);
>> +		if (!rpdev) {
>> +			dev_err(&ctrldev->dev, "failed to create %s channel\n", chinfo.name);
>> +			ret = -ENXIO;
>> +		}
>> +		break;
>> +
>> +	case RPMSG_RELEASE_DEV_IOCTL:
>> +		ret = rpmsg_release_channel(ctrldev->rpdev, &chinfo);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			dev_err(&ctrldev->dev, "failed to release %s channel (%d)\n",
>> +				chinfo.name, ret);
>> +		break;
>> +
>> +	default:
>> +		ret = -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +	mutex_unlock(&ctrldev->ctrl_lock);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>>  };
>>  
>>  static const struct file_operations rpmsg_ctrldev_fops = {
>> @@ -119,6 +147,7 @@ static int rpmsg_ctrldev_probe(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
>>  	device_initialize(dev);
>>  	dev->parent = &rpdev->dev;
>>  
>> +	mutex_init(&ctrldev->ctrl_lock);
>>  	cdev_init(&ctrldev->cdev, &rpmsg_ctrldev_fops);
>>  	ctrldev->cdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>>  
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rpmsg.h b/include/uapi/linux/rpmsg.h
>> index f5ca8740f3fb..1637e68177d9 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/rpmsg.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/rpmsg.h
>> @@ -33,4 +33,14 @@ struct rpmsg_endpoint_info {
>>   */
>>  #define RPMSG_DESTROY_EPT_IOCTL	_IO(0xb5, 0x2)
>>  
>> +/**
>> + * Instantiate a new local rpmsg service device.
>> + */
>> +#define RPMSG_CREATE_DEV_IOCTL	_IOW(0xb5, 0x3, struct rpmsg_endpoint_info)
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * Release a local rpmsg device.
>> + */
>> +#define RPMSG_RELEASE_DEV_IOCTL	_IOW(0xb5, 0x4, struct rpmsg_endpoint_info)
>> +
>>  #endif
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>