[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB7PR04MB5017C6E0D6223B4D9B80EA1DF8099@DB7PR04MB5017.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 10:10:05 +0000
From: "Y.b. Lu" <yangbo.lu@....com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"mptcp@...ts.linux.dev" <mptcp@...ts.linux.dev>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Rui Sousa <rui.sousa@....com>,
Sebastien Laveze <sebastien.laveze@....com>
Subject: RE: [net-next, v3, 05/10] ethtool: add a new command for getting PHC
virtual clocks
Hi Jakub,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Sent: 2021年6月16日 3:49
> To: Y.b. Lu <yangbo.lu@....com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org; mptcp@...ts.linux.dev; Richard Cochran
> <richardcochran@...il.com>; David S . Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Mat
> Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>; Matthieu Baerts
> <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>; Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>; Michal
> Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>; Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>;
> Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>; Rui Sousa <rui.sousa@....com>; Sebastien
> Laveze <sebastien.laveze@....com>
> Subject: Re: [net-next, v3, 05/10] ethtool: add a new command for getting PHC
> virtual clocks
>
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 17:45:12 +0800 Yangbo Lu wrote:
> > Add an interface for getting PHC (PTP Hardware Clock) virtual clocks,
> > which are based on PHC physical clock providing hardware timestamp to
> > network packets.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@....com>
>
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h
> > b/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h index cfef6b08169a..0fb04f945767 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> > #include <linux/const.h>
> > #include <linux/types.h>
> > #include <linux/if_ether.h>
> > +#include <linux/ptp_clock.h>
> >
> > #ifndef __KERNEL__
> > #include <limits.h> /* for INT_MAX */ @@ -1341,6 +1342,18 @@ struct
> > ethtool_ts_info {
> > __u32 rx_reserved[3];
> > };
> >
> > +/**
> > + * struct ethtool_phc_vclocks - holds a device's PTP virtual clocks
> > + * @cmd: command number = %ETHTOOL_GET_PHC_VCLOCKS
> > + * @num: number of PTP vclocks
> > + * @index: all index values of PTP vclocks */ struct
> > +ethtool_phc_vclocks {
> > + __u32 cmd;
> > + __u8 num;
> > + __s32 index[PTP_MAX_VCLOCKS];
> > +};
> > +
> > /*
> > * %ETHTOOL_SFEATURES changes features present in features[].valid to
> the
> > * values of corresponding bits in features[].requested. Bits in
> > .requested @@ -1552,6 +1565,7 @@ enum ethtool_fec_config_bits {
> > #define ETHTOOL_PHY_STUNABLE 0x0000004f /* Set PHY tunable
> configuration */
> > #define ETHTOOL_GFECPARAM 0x00000050 /* Get FEC settings */
> > #define ETHTOOL_SFECPARAM 0x00000051 /* Set FEC settings */
> > +#define ETHTOOL_GET_PHC_VCLOCKS 0x00000052 /* Get PHC virtual
> clocks info */
>
> We don't add new IOCTL commands, only netlink API is going to be extended.
> Please remove the IOCTL interface & uAPI.
Will remove. Thanks.
>
> > /* compatibility with older code */
> > #define SPARC_ETH_GSET ETHTOOL_GSET
>
> > +/* PHC VCLOCKS */
> > +
> > +enum {
> > + ETHTOOL_A_PHC_VCLOCKS_UNSPEC,
> > + ETHTOOL_A_PHC_VCLOCKS_HEADER, /* nest - _A_HEADER_*
> */
> > + ETHTOOL_A_PHC_VCLOCKS_NUM, /* u8 */
>
> u32, no need to limit yourself, the netlink attribute is rounded up to 4B
> anyway.
Get it. Will use u32.
>
> > + ETHTOOL_A_PHC_VCLOCKS_INDEX, /* s32 */
>
> This is an array, AFAICT, not a single s32.
Will fix. Thanks.
>
> > +
> > + /* add new constants above here */
> > + __ETHTOOL_A_PHC_VCLOCKS_CNT,
> > + ETHTOOL_A_PHC_VCLOCKS_MAX = (__ETHTOOL_A_PHC_VCLOCKS_CNT -
> 1) };
> > +
> > /* CABLE TEST */
> >
> > enum {
>
> > +static int phc_vclocks_fill_reply(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > + const struct ethnl_req_info *req_base,
> > + const struct ethnl_reply_data *reply_base) {
> > + const struct phc_vclocks_reply_data *data =
> > + PHC_VCLOCKS_REPDATA(reply_base);
> > + const struct ethtool_phc_vclocks *phc_vclocks = &data->phc_vclocks;
> > +
> > + if (phc_vclocks->num <= 0)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + if (nla_put_u32(skb, ETHTOOL_A_PHC_VCLOCKS_NUM, phc_vclocks->num)
> ||
> > + nla_put(skb, ETHTOOL_A_PHC_VCLOCKS_INDEX,
> > + sizeof(phc_vclocks->index), phc_vclocks->index))
>
> Looks like you'll report the whole array, why not just num?
Will report just num. Thanks.
>
> > + return -EMSGSIZE;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +const struct ethnl_request_ops ethnl_phc_vclocks_request_ops = {
> > + .request_cmd = ETHTOOL_MSG_PHC_VCLOCKS_GET,
> > + .reply_cmd = ETHTOOL_MSG_PHC_VCLOCKS_GET_REPLY,
> > + .hdr_attr = ETHTOOL_A_PHC_VCLOCKS_HEADER,
> > + .req_info_size = sizeof(struct phc_vclocks_req_info),
> > + .reply_data_size = sizeof(struct phc_vclocks_reply_data),
> > +
> > + .prepare_data = phc_vclocks_prepare_data,
> > + .reply_size = phc_vclocks_reply_size,
> > + .fill_reply = phc_vclocks_fill_reply,
> > +};
Powered by blists - more mailing lists