linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 26/46] mm/writeback: Add folio_mark

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210622121551.3398730-27-willy@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 22 Jun 2021 13:15:31 +0100
From:   "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
To:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:     "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 26/46] mm/writeback: Add folio_mark_dirty()

Reimplement set_page_dirty() as a wrapper around folio_mark_dirty().
There is no change to filesystems as they were already being called
with the compound_head of the page being marked dirty.  We avoid
several calls to compound_head(), both statically (through
using folio_dirty() instead of PageDirty() and dynamically by
calling folio_mapping() instead of page_mapping().

Also return bool instead of int to show the range of values actually
returned, and add kernel-doc.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
---
 include/linux/mm.h  |  3 ++-
 mm/folio-compat.c   |  6 ++++++
 mm/page-writeback.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 5609095ffcac..3c8dfcb56fa5 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1988,7 +1988,8 @@ int redirty_page_for_writepage(struct writeback_control *wbc,
 				struct page *page);
 void account_page_cleaned(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping,
 			  struct bdi_writeback *wb);
-int set_page_dirty(struct page *page);
+bool folio_mark_dirty(struct folio *folio);
+bool set_page_dirty(struct page *page);
 int set_page_dirty_lock(struct page *page);
 void __cancel_dirty_page(struct page *page);
 static inline void cancel_dirty_page(struct page *page)
diff --git a/mm/folio-compat.c b/mm/folio-compat.c
index db9190fa6bf5..60780ceca363 100644
--- a/mm/folio-compat.c
+++ b/mm/folio-compat.c
@@ -89,3 +89,9 @@ bool set_page_writeback(struct page *page)
 	return folio_start_writeback(page_folio(page));
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_page_writeback);
+
+bool set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
+{
+	return folio_mark_dirty(page_folio(page));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_page_dirty);
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index ffb55ca2ddd5..73b937955cc1 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -2560,18 +2560,21 @@ int redirty_page_for_writepage(struct writeback_control *wbc, struct page *page)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(redirty_page_for_writepage);
 
-/*
- * Dirty a page.
+/**
+ * folio_mark_dirty - Mark a folio as being modified.
+ * @folio: The folio.
+ *
+ * For folios with a mapping this should be done under the page lock
+ * for the benefit of asynchronous memory errors who prefer a consistent
+ * dirty state. This rule can be broken in some special cases,
+ * but should be better not to.
  *
- * For pages with a mapping this should be done under the page lock for the
- * benefit of asynchronous memory errors who prefer a consistent dirty state.
- * This rule can be broken in some special cases, but should be better not to.
+ * Return: True if the folio was newly dirtied, false if it was already dirty.
  */
-int set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
+bool folio_mark_dirty(struct folio *folio)
 {
-	struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
+	struct address_space *mapping = folio_mapping(folio);
 
-	page = compound_head(page);
 	if (likely(mapping)) {
 		/*
 		 * readahead/lru_deactivate_page could remain
@@ -2583,17 +2586,17 @@ int set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
 		 * it will confuse readahead and make it restart the size rampup
 		 * process. But it's a trivial problem.
 		 */
-		if (PageReclaim(page))
-			ClearPageReclaim(page);
-		return mapping->a_ops->set_page_dirty(page);
+		if (folio_reclaim(folio))
+			folio_clear_reclaim_flag(folio);
+		return mapping->a_ops->set_page_dirty(&folio->page);
 	}
-	if (!PageDirty(page)) {
-		if (!TestSetPageDirty(page))
-			return 1;
+	if (!folio_dirty(folio)) {
+		if (!folio_test_set_dirty_flag(folio))
+			return true;
 	}
-	return 0;
+	return false;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_page_dirty);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(folio_mark_dirty);
 
 /*
  * set_page_dirty() is racy if the caller has no reference against
-- 
2.30.2