[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YNHu8GxbzYStfj4W@orome.fritz.box>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 16:08:48 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Jiajun Cao <jjcao20@...an.edu.cn>
Cc: yuanxzhang@...an.edu.cn, Xin Tan <tanxin.ctf@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
Mohan Kumar <mkumard@...dia.com>,
Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: hda: Add IRQ check for platform_get_irq()
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 09:19:42PM +0800, Jiajun Cao wrote:
> The function hda_tegra_first_init() neglects to check the return
> value after executing platform_get_irq().
>
> hda_tegra_first_init() should check the return value (if negative
> error number) for errors so as to not pass a negative value to
> the devm_request_irq().
>
> Fix it by adding a check for the return value irq_id.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiajun Cao <jjcao20@...an.edu.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Tan <tanxin.ctf@...il.com>
> ---
> sound/pci/hda/hda_tegra.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
The original code is probably harmless because it looks like the call to
request_irq() would return -EINVAL if irq_id was a negative error code.
But checking the return value is still a good idea, so:
Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists