[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YNH2mDwgsd5r+1Xs@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:41:28 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jia He <justin.he@....com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, nd@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] lib/test_printf.c: add test cases for '%pD'
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 10:06:34PM +0800, Jia He wrote:
> After the behaviour of specifier '%pD' is changed to print the full path
> of struct file, the related test cases are also updated.
>
> Given the full path string of '%pD' is prepended from the end of the scratch
> buffer, the check of "wrote beyond the nul-terminator" should be skipped
> for '%pD'.
>
> Parameterize the new using_scratch_space in __test, do_test to skip the
__test()
> test case mentioned above,
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists