linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: hi6421v600: Fix setting wrong driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <162437385474.2223.5068353167104451603.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 22 Jun 2021 16:14:03 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: hi6421v600: Fix setting wrong driver_data

On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 12:33:29 +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> Current code set "config.driver_data = sreg" but sreg only init the mutex,
> the othere fields are just zero. Fix it by pass *info to config.driver_data
> so each regulator can get corresponding data by rdev_get_drvdata().
> 
> Separate enable_mutex from struct hi6421_spmi_reg_info since only need one
> mutex for the driver.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: hi6421v600: Fix setting wrong driver_data
      commit: 9bc146acc33125cd9f365b92f1c02ec89f639977

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark