linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: ath10: add missing ret initialization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 23 Jun 2021 22:26:20 +0300
From:   Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
To:     Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...il.com>
Cc:     kvalo@...eaurora.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>,
        ath10k@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ath10: add missing ret initialization

On Wed, 23 Jun 2021 21:23:27 +0200
Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...il.com> wrote:

> On 23/06/2021 21:14, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
> > In case of not supported chip the code jump
> > to the error handling path, but _ret_ will be set to 0.
> > Returning 0 from probe means, that ->probe() succeeded, but
> > it's not true when chip is not supported.
> > 
> > Fixes: f8914a14623a ("ath10k: restore QCA9880-AR1A (v1) detection")
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
> 
> I think this is already fixed by:
> 
> commit e2783e2f39ba99178dedfc1646d5cc0979d1bab3
> Author: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
> Date:   Mon May 31 17:41:28 2021 +0300
> 
>      ath10k: add missing error return code in ath10k_pci_probe()
> 
> 

Ah, i didn't check linux-next tree, my bad :(

Thanks for pointing it out



With regards,
Pavel Skripkin