[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1babfd1c-bee1-12e5-a9d9-9507891efdfd@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 22:02:11 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 25/54] KVM: x86/mmu: Add helpers to query mmu_role bits
On 22/06/21 19:57, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> +static inline bool is_##reg##_##name(struct kvm_mmu *mmu) \
What do you think about calling these is_mmu_##name? The point of
having these helpers is that the register doesn't count, and they return
the effective value (e.g. false in most EPT cases).
Paolo
> +{ \
> + return !!(mmu->mmu_role. base_or_ext . reg##_##name); \
> +}
> +BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(ext, cr0, pg);
> +BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(base, cr0, wp);
> +BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(ext, cr4, pse);
> +BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(ext, cr4, pae);
> +BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(ext, cr4, smep);
> +BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(ext, cr4, smap);
> +BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(ext, cr4, pke);
> +BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(ext, cr4, la57);
> +BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(base, efer, nx);
> +
> struct kvm_mmu_role_regs vcpu_to_role_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists