[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d9004cf0-d7ac-dc7d-06ad-6669fe11a21b@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 23:33:09 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/54] KVM: x86/mmu: Bug fixes and summer cleaning
On 23/06/21 23:06, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>
>> This is good stuff, I made a few comments but almost all of them (all except
>> the last comment on patch 9, "Unconditionally zap unsync SPs") are cosmetic
>> and I can resolve them myself.
> The 0-day bot also reported some warnings. vcpu_to_role_regs() needs to be
> static, the helpers are added without a user. I liked the idea of adding the
> helpers in one patch, but I can't really defend adding them without a user. :-/
Yep, I noticed them too.
We can just mark them static inline, which is a good idea anyway and
enough to shut up the compiler (clang might behave different in this
respect for .h and .c files, but again it's just a warning and not a
bisection breakage).
Paolo
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c:209:26: warning: no previous prototype for function 'vcpu_to_role_regs' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> struct kvm_mmu_role_regs vcpu_to_role_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> ^
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c:209:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
> struct kvm_mmu_role_regs vcpu_to_role_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> ^
> static
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c:199:1: warning: unused function '____is_cr0_wp' [-Wunused-function]
> BUILD_MMU_ROLE_REGS_ACCESSOR(cr0, wp, X86_CR0_WP);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists