[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <80a120a4-305d-33e7-6f97-eb2f154f4cef@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 00:12:54 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/54] KVM: x86/mmu: Bug fixes and summer cleaning
On 24/06/21 00:08, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> We can just mark them static inline, which is a good idea anyway and enough
> But they already are static inline:-(
Yep, I noticed later. :/ Probably the clang difference below?
>> to shut up the compiler (clang might behave different in this respect for .h
>> and .c files, but again it's just a warning and not a bisection breakage).
>
> I was worried about the CONFIG_KVM_WERROR=y case.
CONFIG_KVM_WERROR can always be disabled. "Unused" warnings do
sometimes happen in the middle of large series.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists