[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b0a4f25-0803-9341-f3a4-277d16802295@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 14:59:59 +0800
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@...wei.com>
CC: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
<catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
<sudeep.holla@....com>, <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
<ardb@...nel.org>, <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
<stable@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Li Huafei <lihuafei1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable v5.10 0/7] arm64: Default to 32-bit wide ZONE_DMA
Hi Greg,
There are two more patches about the ZONE_DMA[32] changes, especially
the second one, both them need be backported, thanks.
791ab8b2e3db - arm64: Ignore any DMA offsets in the max_zone_phys()
calculation
2687275a5843 - arm64: Force NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS if crashkernel reservation
is required
On 2021/5/11 20:35, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/3/8 17:58, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 11:20:03AM +0800, Jing Xiangfeng wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2021/3/7 23:24, Greg KH wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 04:09:28PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 15:17 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 03:05:32PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Greg.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 14:46 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 03:33:12PM +0800, Jing Xiangfeng wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Using two distinct DMA zones turned out to be problematic.
>>>>>>>>> Here's an
>>>>>>>>> attempt go back to a saner default.
>>>>>>>> What problem does this solve? How does this fit into the stable
>>>>>>>> kernel
>>>>>>>> rules?
>>>>>>> We changed the way we setup memory zones in arm64 in order to
>>>>>>> cater for
>>>>>>> Raspberry Pi 4's weird DMA constraints: ZONE_DMA spans the lower
>>>>>>> 1GB of memory
>>>>>>> and ZONE_DMA32 the rest of the 32bit address space. Since you
>>>>>>> can't allocate
>>>>>>> memory that crosses zone boundaries, this broke crashkernel
>>>>>>> allocations on big
>>>>>>> machines. This series fixes all this by parsing the HW
>>>>>>> description and checking
>>>>>>> for DMA constrained buses. When not found, the unnecessary zone
>>>>>>> creation is
>>>>>>> skipped.
>>>>>> What kernel/commit caused this "breakage"?
>>>>> 1a8e1cef7603 arm64: use both ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32
>>>> Thanks for the info, all now queued up.
>>> There is a fix in 5.11. Please consider applying the following commit to
>>> 5.10.y:
>>>
>>> aed5041ef9a3 of: unittest: Fix build on architectures without
>>> CONFIG_OF_ADDRES
>>
>> Thanks, now queued up.
>
> Hi Grep, another commit d78050ee3544 "arm64: Remove
> arm64_dma32_phys_limit and its uses" should be involved, thanks.
>
> "Prior to this patch, disabling CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32 leads to CMA
> allocation from the whole RAM as arm64_dma32_phys_limit becomes
> PHYS_MASK+1." from Catalin, see more from the link
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg867356.html
>>
>> greg k-h
>> .
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists