[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM6PR08MB43761598697E6DC08A5E71ADF7089@AM6PR08MB4376.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 02:02:45 +0000
From: Justin He <Justin.He@....com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, nd <nd@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 1/4] fs: introduce helper d_path_unsafe()
Hi Andy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2021 10:37 PM
> To: Justin He <Justin.He@....com>
> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>; Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>;
> Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>; Rasmus Villemoes
> <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>; Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>; Alexander
> Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>; Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-
> foundation.org>; Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>; Eric
> Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>; Ahmed S. Darwish <a.darwish@...utronix.de>;
> linux-doc@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> fsdevel@...r.kernel.org; Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>; Christoph
> Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>; nd <nd@....com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] fs: introduce helper d_path_unsafe()
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 10:06:31PM +0800, Jia He wrote:
> > This helper is similar to d_path() except that it doesn't take any
> > seqlock/spinlock. It is typical for debugging purposes. Besides,
> > an additional return value *prenpend_len* is used to get the full
> > path length of the dentry, ingoring the tail '\0'.
> > the full path length = end - buf - prepend_length - 1
>
> Missed period at the end of sentence.
>
Okay
> > Previously it will skip the prepend_name() loop at once in
> > __prepen_path() when the buffer length is not enough or even negative.
> > prepend_name_with_len() will get the full length of dentry name
> > together with the parent recursively regardless of the buffer length.
>
> > If someone invokes snprintf() with small but positive space,
> > prepend_name_with_len() moves and copies the string partially.
> >
> > More than that, kasprintf() will pass NULL _buf_ and _end_ as the
> > parameters. Hence return at the very beginning with false in this case.
>
> These two paragraphs are talking about printf() interface, while patch has
> nothing to do with it. Please, rephrase in a way that it doesn't refer to
> the
> particular callers. Better to mention them in the corresponding printf()
> patch(es).
>
Okay
> ...
>
> > * prepend_name - prepend a pathname in front of current buffer pointer
> > - * @buffer: buffer pointer
> > - * @buflen: allocated length of the buffer
> > + * @p: prepend buffer which contains buffer pointer and allocated length
>
> > * @name: name string and length qstr structure
>
> Indentation issue btw, can be fixed in the same patch.
Okay
>
> > *
> > * With RCU path tracing, it may race with d_move(). Use READ_ONCE() to
>
> Shouldn't this be a separate change with corresponding Fixes tag?
Sorry, I don't quite understand here.
What do you want to fix?
>
> ...
>
> > +/**
> > + * d_path_unsafe - return the full path of a dentry without taking
> > + * any seqlock/spinlock. This helper is typical for debugging purposes.
>
> Seems you ignored my comment, or forget to test, or compile test with
> kernel
> doc validator enabled doesn't show any issues. If it's the latter, we have
> to
> fix kernel doc validator.
>
> TL;DR: describe parameters as well.
>
My bad. Apologize for that.
> > + */
>
> ...
>
> > + struct path root;
> > + struct mount *mnt = real_mount(path->mnt);
> > + DECLARE_BUFFER(b, buf, buflen);
>
> Can wee keep this in reversed xmas tree order?
Sure 😊
--
Cheers,
Justin (Jia He)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists