lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 23 Jun 2021 21:12:36 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the printk
 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:

  lib/dump_stack.c

between commit:

  766c268bc6d3 ("lib/dump_stack: move cpu lock to printk.c")

from the printk tree and commit:

  250da8183544 ("printk: introduce dump_stack_lvl()")

from the akpm-current tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc lib/dump_stack.c
index 5ebf4375fa8c,586e3f2c6a15..000000000000
--- a/lib/dump_stack.c
+++ b/lib/dump_stack.c
@@@ -84,16 -84,56 +84,22 @@@ static void __dump_stack(const char *lo
   *
   * Architectures can override this implementation by implementing its own.
   */
- asmlinkage __visible void dump_stack(void)
 -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 -static atomic_t dump_lock = ATOMIC_INIT(-1);
 -
+ asmlinkage __visible void dump_stack_lvl(const char *log_lvl)
  {
  	unsigned long flags;
 -	int was_locked;
 -	int old;
 -	int cpu;
  
  	/*
  	 * Permit this cpu to perform nested stack dumps while serialising
  	 * against other CPUs
  	 */
 -retry:
 -	local_irq_save(flags);
 -	cpu = smp_processor_id();
 -	old = atomic_cmpxchg(&dump_lock, -1, cpu);
 -	if (old == -1) {
 -		was_locked = 0;
 -	} else if (old == cpu) {
 -		was_locked = 1;
 -	} else {
 -		local_irq_restore(flags);
 -		/*
 -		 * Wait for the lock to release before jumping to
 -		 * atomic_cmpxchg() in order to mitigate the thundering herd
 -		 * problem.
 -		 */
 -		do { cpu_relax(); } while (atomic_read(&dump_lock) != -1);
 -		goto retry;
 -	}
 -
 -	__dump_stack(log_lvl);
 -
 -	if (!was_locked)
 -		atomic_set(&dump_lock, -1);
 -
 -	local_irq_restore(flags);
 -}
 -#else
 -asmlinkage __visible void dump_stack_lvl(const char *log_lvl)
 -{
 +	printk_cpu_lock_irqsave(flags);
- 	__dump_stack();
+ 	__dump_stack(log_lvl);
 +	printk_cpu_unlock_irqrestore(flags);
  }
 -#endif
+ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_stack_lvl);
+ 
+ asmlinkage __visible void dump_stack(void)
+ {
+ 	dump_stack_lvl(KERN_DEFAULT);
+ }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_stack);

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ