[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210623113002.111448-6-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 14:29:57 +0300
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND
64-BIT)),
x86@...nel.org (maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)),
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/10] KVM: SVM: svm_set_vintr don't warn if AVIC is active but is about to be deactivated
It is possible for AVIC inhibit and AVIC active state to be mismatched.
Currently we disable AVIC right away on vCPU which started the AVIC inhibit
request thus this warning doesn't trigger but at least in theory,
if svm_set_vintr is called at the same time on multiple vCPUs,
the warning can happen.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index 50405c561394..d14be8aba2d7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -1560,8 +1560,11 @@ static void svm_set_vintr(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
{
struct vmcb_control_area *control;
- /* The following fields are ignored when AVIC is enabled */
- WARN_ON(kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(&svm->vcpu));
+ /*
+ * The following fields are ignored when AVIC is enabled
+ */
+ WARN_ON(kvm_apicv_activated(svm->vcpu.kvm));
+
svm_set_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_VINTR);
/*
--
2.26.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists