[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YNMffBWvs/Fz2ptK@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 12:48:12 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Matteo Croce <mcroce@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
Luca Boccassi <bluca@...ian.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Javier Gonz??lez <javier@...igon.com>,
Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@....com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
JeffleXu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] block: add disk sequence number
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 12:58:53PM +0200, Matteo Croce wrote:
> +void inc_diskseq(struct gendisk *disk)
> +{
> + static atomic64_t diskseq;
Please don't hide file scope variables in functions.
Can you explain a little more why we need a global sequence count vs
a per-disk one here?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists