linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/sgx: Suppress WARN on inability to sanitize EPC if ksgxd is stopped

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210623133219.v6c62zwtj5qowib3@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 23 Jun 2021 16:32:19 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To:     Du Cheng <ducheng2@...il.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        x86@...nel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sgx: Suppress WARN on inability to sanitize EPC if
 ksgxd is stopped

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 02:03:09PM +0800, Du Cheng wrote:
> Le Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 05:44:58PM -0700, Sean Christopherson a écrit :
> > Don't WARN on having unsanitized EPC pages if ksgxd is stopped early,
> > e.g. if sgx_init() realizes there will be no downstream consumers of EPC.
> > If ksgxd is stopped early, EPC pages may be left on the dirty list, but
> > that's ok because ksgxd is only stopped if SGX initialization failed or
> > if the kernel is going down.  In either case, the EPC won't be used.
> > 
> > This bug was exposed by the addition of KVM support, but has existed and
> > was hittable since the original sanitization code was added.  Prior to
> > adding KVM support, if Launch Control was not fully enabled, e.g. when
> > running on older hardware, sgx_init() bailed immediately before spawning
> > ksgxd because X86_FEATURE_SGX was cleared if X86_FEATURE_SGX_LC was
> > unsupported.
> > 
> > With KVM support, sgx_drv_init() handles the X86_FEATURE_SGX_LC check
> > manually, so now there's any easy-to-hit case where sgx_init() will spawn
> > ksgxd and _then_ fail to initialize, which results in sgx_init() stopping
> > ksgxd before it finishes sanitizing the EPC.
> > 
> > Prior to KVM support, the bug was much harder to hit because it basically
> > required char device registration to fail.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Du Cheng <ducheng2@...il.com>
> > Fixes: e7e0545299d8 ("x86/sgx: Initialize metadata for Enclave Page Cache (EPC) sections")
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Lightly tested due to lack of hardware.  I hacked the flow to verify that
> > stopping early will leave work pending, and that rechecking should_stop()
> > suppress the resulting WARN.
> > 
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
> > index ad904747419e..fbad2b9625a5 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
> > @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ static int ksgxd(void *p)
> >  	__sgx_sanitize_pages(&sgx_dirty_page_list);
> >  
> >  	/* sanity check: */
> > -	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&sgx_dirty_page_list));
> > +	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&sgx_dirty_page_list) && !kthread_should_stop());
> >  
> >  	while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
> >  		if (try_to_freeze())
> > -- 
> > 2.32.0.272.g935e593368-goog
> > 
> 
> I applied this patch on 5.13-rc6, and it no longer causes to trigger WARN_ON()
> on my NUC:
> 
> ```
> 
> [    0.669411] PCI-DMA: Using software bounce buffering for IO (SWIOTLB)
> [    0.669412] software IO TLB: mapped [mem 0x0000000017cb9000-0x000000001bcb9000] (64MB)
> [    0.672788] platform rtc_cmos: registered platform RTC device (no PNP device found)
> [    0.672805] sgx: EPC section 0x30200000-0x35f7ffff
> [    0.674239] Initialise system trusted keyrings
> [    0.674254] Key type blacklist registered
> 
> ```
> 
> Regards,
> Du Cheng

Can you thus give a tested-by for this?

/Jarkko