linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] loop: increment sequence number

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YNNEdbr+0p+PzinQ@infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 23 Jun 2021 15:25:57 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Luca Boccassi <bluca@...ian.org>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Matteo Croce <mcroce@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Javier Gonz??lez <javier@...igon.com>,
        Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@....com>,
        Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        JeffleXu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] loop: increment sequence number

On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 02:13:25PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-06-23 at 12:57 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 12:58:58PM +0200, Matteo Croce wrote:
> > > From: Matteo Croce <mcroce@...rosoft.com>
> > > 
> > > On a very loaded system, if there are many events queued up from multiple
> > > attach/detach cycles, it's impossible to match them up with the
> > > LOOP_CONFIGURE or LOOP_SET_FD call, since we don't know where the position
> > > of our own association in the queue is[1].
> > > Not even an empty uevent queue is a reliable indication that we already
> > > received the uevent we were waiting for, since with multi-partition block
> > > devices each partition's event is queued asynchronously and might be
> > > delivered later.
> > > 
> > > Increment the disk sequence number when setting or changing the backing
> > > file, so the userspace knows which backing file generated the event:
> > 
> > Instead of manually incrementing the sequence here, can we make loop
> > generate the DISK_EVENT_MEDIA_CHANGE event on a backing device (aka
> > media) change?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This was answered in the v1 thread:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20210315201331.GA2577561@casper.infradead.org/t/#m8a677028572e826352cbb1e19d1b9c1f3b6bff4b
> 
> The fundamental issue is that we'd be back at trying to correlate
> events to loopdev instances, which does not work reliably - hence this
> patch series. With the new ioctl, we can get the id immediately and
> without delay when we create the device, with no possible races. Then
> we can handle events reliably, as we can correlate correctly in all
> cases.

I very much disagree with your reply there.  The device now points to
a different media.  Both for the loop device, a floppy or a CD changer
probably by some kind of user action.  In the last cast it might even
by done entirely locally through a script just like the loop device.