lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 23 Jun 2021 09:28:55 -0700
From:   Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
        clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ACPI: bgrt: Use sysfs_emit

On 6/22/2021 10:51 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 06:38:02PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>> sysfs_emit is preferred to snprintf for emitting values after
>> commit 2efc459d06f1 ("sysfs: Add sysfs_emit and sysfs_emit_at to format
>> sysfs output").
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
> 
> Perhaps just squash this into patch 1? Looks good otherwise!
> 

I thought about it but sysfs_emit is a relatively new API and the 
previous change may want to be backported but I do not have a strong 
opinion so I can squash it if Rafael or Len feel strongly :)

Thanks for taking a look, cheers!
Nathan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ