[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b4f8f250-14ac-b964-c82d-6a3ef48bd38f@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 19:11:57 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/54] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop smep_andnot_wp check from "uses
NX" for shadow MMUs
On 22/06/21 19:57, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Drop the smep_andnot_wp role check from the "uses NX" calculation now
> that all non-nested shadow MMUs treat NX as used via the !TDP check.
>
> The shadow MMU for nested NPT, which shares the helper, does not need to
> deal with SMEP (or WP) as NPT walks are always "user" accesses and WP is
> explicitly noted as being ignored:
>
> Table walks for guest page tables are always treated as user writes at
> the nested page table level.
>
> A table walk for the guest page itself is always treated as a user
> access at the nested page table level
>
> The host hCR0.WP bit is ignored under nested paging.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 96c16a6e0044..ca7680d1ea24 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -4223,8 +4223,7 @@ reset_shadow_zero_bits_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *context)
> * NX can be used by any non-nested shadow MMU to avoid having to reset
> * MMU contexts. Note, KVM forces EFER.NX=1 when TDP is disabled.
> */
> - bool uses_nx = context->nx || !tdp_enabled ||
> - context->mmu_role.base.smep_andnot_wp;
> + bool uses_nx = context->nx || !tdp_enabled;
> struct rsvd_bits_validate *shadow_zero_check;
> int i;
>
>
Good idea, but why not squash it into patch 2?
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists