[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YNNudzDzzx7ZBwf+@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 19:25:11 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Rocco Yue <rocco.yue@...iatek.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
wsd_upstream@...iatek.com, chao.song@...iatek.com,
zhuoliang.zhang@...iatek.com, kuohong.wang@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drivers: net: mediatek: initial implementation of
ccmni
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 07:34:52PM +0800, Rocco Yue wrote:
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ccmni_rx_push);
Why are you exporting symbols that are not used by anyone in this patch
series? That doesn't feel right. Who needs this?
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ccmni_hif_hook);
Same with this, who calls this?
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/ccmni/ccmni.h
Why do you have a .h file for a single .c file? that shouldn't be
needed.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists