| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20210623173848.318-4-will@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 18:38:35 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
Valentin Schneider <Valentin.Schneider@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 03/16] cpuset: Honour task_cpu_possible_mask() in guarantee_online_cpus()
Asymmetric systems may not offer the same level of userspace ISA support
across all CPUs, meaning that some applications cannot be executed by
some CPUs. As a concrete example, upcoming arm64 big.LITTLE designs do
not feature support for 32-bit applications on both clusters.
Modify guarantee_online_cpus() to take task_cpu_possible_mask() into
account when trying to find a suitable set of online CPUs for a given
task. This will avoid passing an invalid mask to set_cpus_allowed_ptr()
during ->attach() and will subsequently allow the cpuset hierarchy to be
taken into account when forcefully overriding the affinity mask for a
task which requires migration to a compatible CPU.
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <Valentin.Schneider@....com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
---
include/linux/cpuset.h | 2 +-
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h
index ed6ec677dd6b..414a8e694413 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ static inline void cpuset_read_unlock(void) { }
static inline void cpuset_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p,
struct cpumask *mask)
{
- cpumask_copy(mask, cpu_possible_mask);
+ cpumask_copy(mask, task_cpu_possible_mask(p));
}
static inline void cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(struct task_struct *p)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index 6ec7303d5b1f..4e7c271e3800 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -372,18 +372,29 @@ static inline bool is_in_v2_mode(void)
}
/*
- * Return in pmask the portion of a cpusets's cpus_allowed that
- * are online. If none are online, walk up the cpuset hierarchy
- * until we find one that does have some online cpus.
+ * Return in pmask the portion of a task's cpusets's cpus_allowed that
+ * are online and are capable of running the task. If none are found,
+ * walk up the cpuset hierarchy until we find one that does have some
+ * appropriate cpus.
*
* One way or another, we guarantee to return some non-empty subset
* of cpu_online_mask.
*
* Call with callback_lock or cpuset_mutex held.
*/
-static void guarantee_online_cpus(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *pmask)
+static void guarantee_online_cpus(struct task_struct *tsk,
+ struct cpumask *pmask)
{
- while (!cpumask_intersects(cs->effective_cpus, cpu_online_mask)) {
+ const struct cpumask *possible_mask = task_cpu_possible_mask(tsk);
+ struct cpuset *cs;
+
+ if (WARN_ON(!cpumask_and(pmask, possible_mask, cpu_online_mask)))
+ cpumask_copy(pmask, cpu_online_mask);
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ cs = task_cs(tsk);
+
+ while (!cpumask_intersects(cs->effective_cpus, pmask)) {
cs = parent_cs(cs);
if (unlikely(!cs)) {
/*
@@ -393,11 +404,13 @@ static void guarantee_online_cpus(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *pmask)
* cpuset's effective_cpus is on its way to be
* identical to cpu_online_mask.
*/
- cpumask_copy(pmask, cpu_online_mask);
- return;
+ goto out_unlock;
}
}
- cpumask_and(pmask, cs->effective_cpus, cpu_online_mask);
+ cpumask_and(pmask, pmask, cs->effective_cpus);
+
+out_unlock:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
}
/*
@@ -2199,15 +2212,13 @@ static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
percpu_down_write(&cpuset_rwsem);
- /* prepare for attach */
- if (cs == &top_cpuset)
- cpumask_copy(cpus_attach, cpu_possible_mask);
- else
- guarantee_online_cpus(cs, cpus_attach);
-
guarantee_online_mems(cs, &cpuset_attach_nodemask_to);
cgroup_taskset_for_each(task, css, tset) {
+ if (cs != &top_cpuset)
+ guarantee_online_cpus(task, cpus_attach);
+ else
+ cpumask_copy(cpus_attach, task_cpu_possible_mask(task));
/*
* can_attach beforehand should guarantee that this doesn't
* fail. TODO: have a better way to handle failure here
@@ -3302,9 +3313,7 @@ void cpuset_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *tsk, struct cpumask *pmask)
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&callback_lock, flags);
- rcu_read_lock();
- guarantee_online_cpus(task_cs(tsk), pmask);
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ guarantee_online_cpus(tsk, pmask);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&callback_lock, flags);
}
--
2.32.0.93.g670b81a890-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists