[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210623183736.GA472@willie-the-truck>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 19:37:37 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@...cinc.com>
Cc: Claire Chang <tientzu@...omium.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, mpe@...erman.id.au,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, jgross@...e.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com, thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com,
peterz@...radead.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
chris@...is-wilson.co.uk, grant.likely@....com, paulus@...ba.org,
mingo@...nel.org, jxgao@...gle.com, sstabellini@...nel.org,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, xypron.glpk@....de,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
bskeggs@...hat.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@...el.com,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, daniel@...ll.ch,
airlied@...ux.ie, maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
rodrigo.vivi@...el.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>,
thomas.lendacky@....com, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
bauerman@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 06/12] swiotlb: Use is_swiotlb_force_bounce for
swiotlb data bouncing
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 12:39:29PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
>
>
> On 6/18/2021 11:40 PM, Claire Chang wrote:
> > Propagate the swiotlb_force into io_tlb_default_mem->force_bounce and
> > use it to determine whether to bounce the data or not. This will be
> > useful later to allow for different pools.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Claire Chang <tientzu@...omium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> > Tested-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
> > Tested-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> > Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
>
> Reverting the rest of the series up to this patch fixed a boot crash with NVMe on today's linux-next.
Hmm, so that makes patch 7 the suspicious one, right?
Looking at that one more closely, it looks like swiotlb_find_slots() takes
'alloc_size + offset' as its 'alloc_size' parameter from
swiotlb_tbl_map_single() and initialises 'mem->slots[i].alloc_size' based
on 'alloc_size + offset', which looks like a change in behaviour from the
old code, which didn't include the offset there.
swiotlb_release_slots() then adds the offset back on afaict, so we end up
accounting for it twice and possibly unmap more than we're supposed to?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists