linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] KVM: mmu: also return page from gfn_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:42:33 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@...il.com>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
        David Stevens <stevensd@...omium.org>,
        Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
        Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>
Cc:     Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] KVM: mmu: also return page from gfn_to_pfn

On 24/06/21 10:52, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> For now, wrap all calls to gfn_to_pfn functions in the new helper
>> function. Callers which don't need the page struct will be updated in
>> follow-up patches.
> Hmm. You mean callers that do need the page will be updated? Normally
> if there will be leftover users that don't need the struct page then
> you would go the other way and keep the old call the same, and add a new
> one (gfn_to_pfn_page) just for those that need it.

Needing kvm_pfn_page_unwrap is a sign that something might be buggy, so 
it's a good idea to move the short name to the common case and the ugly 
kvm_pfn_page_unwrap(gfn_to_pfn(...)) for the weird one.  In fact I'm not 
sure there should be any kvm_pfn_page_unwrap in the end.

Paolo