[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210624095147.693801717@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:41:00 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: jpoimboe@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
joro@...tes.org, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, jgross@...e.com,
x86@...nel.org, mbenes@...e.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dvyukov@...gle.com, elver@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/24] x86/xen: Mark cpu_bringup_and_idle() as dead_end_function
The asm_cpu_bringup_and_idle() function is required to push the return
value on the stack in order to make ORC happy, but the only reason
objtool doesn't complain is because of a happy accident.
The thing is that asm_cpu_bringup_and_idle() doesn't return, so
validate_branch() never terminates and falls through to the next
function, which in the normal case is the hypercall_page. And that, as
it happens, is 4095 NOPs and a RET.
Make asm_cpu_bringup_and_idle() terminate on it's own, by making the
function it calls as a dead-end. This way we no longer rely on what
code happens to come after.
Fixes: c3881eb58d56 ("x86/xen: Make the secondary CPU idle tasks reliable")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
tools/objtool/check.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ static bool __dead_end_function(struct o
"rewind_stack_do_exit",
"kunit_try_catch_throw",
"xen_start_kernel",
+ "cpu_bringup_and_idle",
};
if (!func)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists