[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210624124545.2b170258@dellmb>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 12:45:45 +0200
From: Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>
To: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
Subject: Re: Issues during assigning addresses on point to point interfaces
On Sun, 6 Jun 2021 17:10:08 +0200
Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Seems that there is a bug during assigning IP addresses on point to
> point interfaces.
>
> Assigning just one local address works fine:
>
> ip address add fe80::6 dev ppp1 --> inet6 fe80::6/128 scope link
>
> Assigning both local and remote peer address also works fine:
>
> ip address add fe80::7 peer fe80::8 dev ppp1 ---> inet6 fe80::7
> peer fe80::8/128 scope link
>
> But trying to assign just remote peer address does not work. Moreover
> "ip address" call does not fail, it returns zero but instead of
> setting remote peer address, it sets local address:
>
> ip address add peer fe80::5 dev ppp1 --> inet6 fe80::5/128 scope
> link
>
Adding some other people to Cc in order to get their opinions.
It seems this bug is there from the beginning, from commit
caeaba79009c2 ("ipv6: add support of peer address")
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=caeaba79009c2
Maybe some older user-space utilities use IFA_ADDRESS instead of
IFA_LOCAL, and this was done in order to be compatible with them?
Marek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists