linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 03/10] scsi: ufs: Update the return value of supplier pm ops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1b9c53737fbd4a93ced02abe1441f12b@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Thu, 24 Jun 2021 10:11:45 +0800
From:   Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc:     asutoshd@...eaurora.org, nguyenb@...eaurora.org,
        hongwus@...eaurora.org, ziqichen@...eaurora.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/10] scsi: ufs: Update the return value of supplier
 pm ops

On 2021-06-24 05:08, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 6/23/21 12:35 AM, Can Guo wrote:
>> rpm_get_suppliers() is returning an error only if the error is 
>> negative.
>> However, ufshcd_wl_resume() may return a positive error code, e.g., 
>> when
>> hibern8 or SSU cmd fails. Make the positive return value a negative 
>> error
>> code so that consumers are aware of any resume failure from their 
>> supplier.
>> Make the same change to ufshcd_wl_suspend() just to keep symmetry.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>> index abe5f2d..ee70522 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>> @@ -8922,7 +8922,7 @@ static int __ufshcd_wl_suspend(struct ufs_hba 
>> *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)
>>  		ufshcd_release(hba);
>>  	}
>>  	hba->wlu_pm_op_in_progress = false;
>> -	return ret;
>> +	return ret <= 0 ? ret : -EINVAL;
>>  }
>> 
>>  static int __ufshcd_wl_resume(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op 
>> pm_op)
>> @@ -9009,7 +9009,7 @@ static int __ufshcd_wl_resume(struct ufs_hba 
>> *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)
>>  	hba->clk_gating.is_suspended = false;
>>  	ufshcd_release(hba);
>>  	hba->wlu_pm_op_in_progress = false;
>> -	return ret;
>> +	return ret <= 0 ? ret : -EINVAL;
>>  }
> 
> I think the above patch shows that indicating failure by either
> returning a positive or a negative value is a booby trap. Please modify
> ufshcd_send_request_sense() and ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode() such that
> these return a value that is either zero or negative. Are there any
> other functions than that need to be modified?

Yes, there are more of them - both enter/exit_hibern8() and 
reset_and_restore()
can return positive values. I will modify all of them in next ver.

Thanks,

Can Guo.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.