[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210624112500.rhtqp7j3odq6b6bq@Rk>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 19:25:00 +0800
From: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@...il.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poirier@...il.com>,
Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@...e.com>,
Manish Chopra <manishc@...vell.com>,
"supporter:QLOGIC QLGE 10Gb ETHERNET DRIVER"
<GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 16/19] staging: qlge: remove deadcode in qlge_build_rx_skb
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 10:29:39AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 09:48:59PM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
>> This part of code is for the case that "the headers and data are in
>> a single large buffer". However, qlge_process_mac_split_rx_intr is for
>> handling packets that packets underwent head splitting. In reality, with
>> jumbo frame enabled, the part of code couldn't be reached regardless of
>> the packet size when ping the NIC.
>>
>
>This commit message is a bit confusing. We're just deleting the else
>statement. Once I knew that then it was easy enough to review
>qlge_process_mac_rx_intr() and see that if if
>ib_mac_rsp->flags3 & IB_MAC_IOCB_RSP_DL is set then
>ib_mac_rsp->flags4 & IB_MAC_IOCB_RSP_HV must be set.
Do you suggest moving to upper if, i.e.
} else if (ib_mac_rsp->flags3 & IB_MAC_IOCB_RSP_DL && ib_mac_rsp->flags4 & IB_MAC_IOCB_RSP_HS) {
and then deleting the else statement?
>
>regards,
>dan carpenter
>
--
Best regards,
Coiby
Powered by blists - more mailing lists