[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YNRzFOIKtUZfnsu7@orome.fritz.box>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 13:57:08 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@...iqon.com>,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, pdeschrijver@...dia.com,
pgaikwad@...dia.com, jonathanh@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: clk-tegra124-dfll-fcpu: don't use devm
functions for regulator
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:47:37AM +0300, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> The purpose of the device-managed functions is to bind the life-time of an
> object to that of a parent device object.
>
> This is not the case for the 'vdd-cpu' regulator in this driver. A
> reference is obtained via devm_regulator_get() and immediately released
> with devm_regulator_put().
>
> In this case, the usage of devm_ functions is slightly excessive, as the
> un-managed versions of these functions is a little cleaner (and slightly
> more economical in terms of allocation).
>
> This change converts the devm_regulator_{get,put}() to
> regulator_{get,put}() in the get_alignment_from_regulator() function of
> this driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@...iqon.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra124-dfll-fcpu.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Indeed, this seems unnecessary:
Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Mike, Stephen: do you want to pick this up directly or would you prefer
if I collected this into a clk branch for the next cycle?
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists