lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YNR9CS/PfG7s1e71@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Jun 2021 14:39:37 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc:     Krzysztof Hałasa <khalasa@...p.pl>,
        Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] MEDIA: Driver for ON Semi AR0521 camera sensor

On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 03:10:34PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> CC'ing Greg to get his expert opinion on the topic.
> 
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 06:57:55AM +0200, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
> > Hi Kieran, and others,
> > 
> > Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com> writes:
> > 
> > >>> The work is not published under GPL.
> > >
> > > This seems like an odd thing to say when your patch explicitly contains:
> > >
> > >> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ar0521.c
> > >> @@ -0,0 +1,1060 @@
> > >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > 
> > Such tags have meaning only in the kernel context, when signed-off etc.

Huh?  It is a statement of the license of the file itself, it is
independent of "Signed-off-by:" which is a legal agreement of a totally
different thing and is independent of license type entirely.

> > Alone, they aren't legal statements, especially when I explicitly state
> > that it's not signed-off-by me yet. Nevertheless...

Putting the above line on a file _IS_ a legal declaration that the file
is released under GPL-2.0.  It's pretty simple :)

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ