[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANLsYkyCGO6tVn7WWfw6BPJwsHPT6dbWmXHXAzEh8X-x=2ENGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 10:26:13 -0600
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: "liuqi (BA)" <liuqi115@...wei.com>
Cc: Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Jonathan Zhou <jonathan.zhouwen@...wei.com>,
f.fangjian@...wei.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Coresight ML <coresight@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] Documentation: tracing: Documentation for
ultrasoc framework and drivers
> >> +Example usage of perf::
> >> +
> >> + $# ./perf list pmu
> >> + cs_etm// [Kernel PMU event]
> >> + $# ./perf record -e cs_etm/@...k_smb0/ -C 0 --per-thread sleep 2s
> >> + [ perf record: Woken up 2 times to write data ]
> >> + [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.288 MB perf.data ]
> >> + $# ./perf report
> >
> > After reading all this and without looking at the rest of the patchset it seems
> > to me this work should go under drivers/hwtracing/coresight/.
> >
>
> So how about drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc?
>
It's hard to say at this time - I'll advise further once I have
reviewed the other patches.
> > There is a lot of code to review and as such it will take me a fair amount of
> > time to go through it all. Comments will be scattered over several days (weeks)
> > - I will set you know when I am done.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mathieu
>
> Ok, thanks for revewing this patchset
>
> Qi
> >
> >> --
> >> 2.7.4
> >>
> > .
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists