linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 09/10] vduse: Introduce VDUSE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d2334f66-907c-2e9c-ea4f-f912008e9be8@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:34:46 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     Yongji Xie <xieyongji@...edance.com>
Cc:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
        Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...onical.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, bcrl@...ck.org,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...tfour.com>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>, joro@...tes.org,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, songmuchun@...edance.com,
        virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/10] vduse: Introduce VDUSE - vDPA Device in
 Userspace


在 2021/6/23 下午1:50, Yongji Xie 写道:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 11:31 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> 在 2021/6/22 下午4:14, Yongji Xie 写道:
>>> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 3:50 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
>>>> 在 2021/6/22 下午3:22, Yongji Xie 写道:
>>>>>> We need fix a way to propagate the error to the userspace.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> E.g if we want to stop the deivce, we will delay the status reset until
>>>>>> we get respose from the userspace?
>>>>>>
>>>>> I didn't get how to delay the status reset. And should it be a DoS
>>>>> that we want to fix if the userspace doesn't give a response forever?
>>>> You're right. So let's make set_status() can fail first, then propagate
>>>> its failure via VHOST_VDPA_SET_STATUS.
>>>>
>>> OK. So we only need to propagate the failure in the vhost-vdpa case, right?
>>
>> I think not, we need to deal with the reset for virtio as well:
>>
>> E.g in register_virtio_devices(), we have:
>>
>>           /* We always start by resetting the device, in case a previous
>>            * driver messed it up.  This also tests that code path a
>> little. */
>>         dev->config->reset(dev);
>>
>> We probably need to make reset can fail and then fail the
>> register_virtio_device() as well.
>>
> OK, looks like virtio_add_status() and virtio_device_ready()[1] should
> be also modified if we need to propagate the failure in the
> virtio-vdpa case. Or do we only need to care about the reset case?
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210517093428.670-1-xieyongji@bytedance.com/


My understanding is DRIVER_OK is not something that needs to be validated:

"

DRIVER_OK (4)
Indicates that the driver is set up and ready to drive the device.

"

Since the spec doesn't require to re-read the and check if DRIVER_OK is 
set in 3.1.1 Driver Requirements: Device Initialization.

It's more about "telling the device that driver is ready."

But we don have some status bit that requires the synchronization with 
the device.

1) FEATURES_OK, spec requires to re-read the status bit to check whether 
or it it was set by the device:

"

Re-read device status to ensure the FEATURES_OK bit is still set: 
otherwise, the device does not support our subset of features and the 
device is unusable.

"

This is useful for some device which can only support a subset of the 
features. E.g a device that can only work for packed virtqueue. This 
means the current design of set_features won't work, we need either:

1a) relay the set_features request to userspace

or

1b) introduce a mandated_device_features during device creation and 
validate the driver features during the set_features(), and don't set 
FEATURES_OK if they don't match.


2) Some transports (PCI) requires to re-read the status to ensure the 
synchronization.

"

After writing 0 to device_status, the driver MUST wait for a read of 
device_status to return 0 before reinitializing the device.

"

So we need to deal with both FEATURES_OK and reset, but probably not 
DRIVER_OK.

Thanks


>
> Thanks,
> Yongji
>