linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: pas: Add SC7280 MPSS support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YNZkoMIFJXOlSI6t@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Jun 2021 16:20:00 -0700
From:   Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To:     Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, will@...nel.org,
        saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org, ohad@...ery.com,
        agross@...nel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
        robin.murphy@....com, joro@...tes.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, evgreen@...omium.org,
        dianders@...omium.org, swboyd@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: pas: Add SC7280 MPSS
 support

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:58:45PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> On 2021-06-25 22:42, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 01:17:30AM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> > > Add MPSS PAS support for SC7280 SoCs.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
> > 
> > On which tree is this series based? I guess it must be the remoteproc
> > tree
> > since the conversion of the binding to YAML isn't in Linus' tree yet,
> > however the patch doesn't apply cleanly against remoteproc/for-next:
> > 
> >   patching file
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,adsp.yaml
> >   Hunk #2 succeeded at 144 (offset -4 lines).
> >   Hunk #3 succeeded at 285 (offset -4 lines).
> >   Hunk #4 succeeded at 416 with fuzz 2 (offset 23 lines).
> >   Hunk #5 succeeded at 492 (offset 25 lines).
> >   Hunk #6 FAILED at 485.
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/cover/1624560727-6870-1-git-send-email-sibis@codeaurora.org/
> 
> sry for wasting your time I missed
> mentioning that it was dependent on
> ^^ series.

Ah, thanks!

Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>