[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <183b71c1-6bb0-8d05-e2ce-e452253259a8@de.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 09:58:27 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: David Stevens <stevensd@...omium.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: do not allow mapping valid but non-refcounted
pages
On 25.06.21 09:36, David Stevens wrote:
> From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
>
> It's possible to create a region which maps valid but non-refcounted
> pages (e.g., tail pages of non-compound higher order allocations). These
> host pages can then be returned by gfn_to_page, gfn_to_pfn, etc., family
> of APIs, which take a reference to the page, which takes it from 0 to 1.
> When the reference is dropped, this will free the page incorrectly.
>
> Fix this by only taking a reference on the page if it was non-zero,
> which indicates it is participating in normal refcounting (and can be
> released with put_page).
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
I guess this would be the small fix for stable? Do we want to add that cc?
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
> ---
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 3dcc2abbfc60..f7445c3bcd90 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -2175,6 +2175,13 @@ static bool vma_is_valid(struct vm_area_struct *vma, bool write_fault)
> return true;
> }
>
> +static int kvm_try_get_pfn(kvm_pfn_t pfn)
> +{
> + if (kvm_is_reserved_pfn(pfn))
> + return 1;
> + return get_page_unless_zero(pfn_to_page(pfn));
> +}
> +
> static int hva_to_pfn_remapped(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long addr, bool *async,
> bool write_fault, bool *writable,
> @@ -2224,13 +2231,21 @@ static int hva_to_pfn_remapped(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> * Whoever called remap_pfn_range is also going to call e.g.
> * unmap_mapping_range before the underlying pages are freed,
> * causing a call to our MMU notifier.
> + *
> + * Certain IO or PFNMAP mappings can be backed with valid
> + * struct pages, but be allocated without refcounting e.g.,
> + * tail pages of non-compound higher order allocations, which
> + * would then underflow the refcount when the caller does the
> + * required put_page. Don't allow those pages here.
> */
> - kvm_get_pfn(pfn);
> + if (!kvm_try_get_pfn(pfn))
> + r = -EFAULT;
>
> out:
> pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
> *p_pfn = pfn;
> - return 0;
> +
> + return r;
> }
>
> /*
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists