[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YNWR5qgkAxzLtUKK@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:20:54 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Oleg Rombakh <olegrom@...gle.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: cgroup SCHED_IDLE support
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 04:11:32PM -0700, Josh Don wrote:
> +static int se_is_idle(struct sched_entity *se)
> +{
> + if (entity_is_task(se))
> + return task_has_idle_policy(task_of(se));
> + return cfs_rq_is_idle(group_cfs_rq(se));
> +}
I'm conflicted on this, on the one hand, since we want 'idle' to be a
sched_entity propery, I'd say, make it a sched_entity field, OTOH,
that's probably going to be a mess too :/
Let me read more..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists