[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k0mi8gga.mognet@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:02:45 +0100
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: PowerPC guest getting "BUG: scheduling while atomic" on linux-next-20210623 during secondary CPUs bringup
On 25/06/21 09:28, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:16:08AM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>> Bharata,
>>
>> I think the regression is due to Commit f1a0a376ca0c ("sched/core:
>> Initialize the idle task with preemption disabled")
>
> So that extra preempt_disable() that got removed would've incremented it
> to 1 and then things would've been fine.
>
> Except.. Valentin changed things such that preempt_count() should've
> been inittialized to 1, instead of 0, but for some raisin that didn't
> stick.. what gives.
>
> So we have init_idle(p) -> init_idle_preempt_count(p) ->
> task_thread_info(p)->preempt_count = PREEMPT_DISABLED;
>
> But somehow, by the time you're running start_secondary(), that's gotten
> to be 0 again. Does DEBUG_PREEMPT give more clues?
Given the preempt_count isn't reset between hotplugs anymore, you might be
able to find the culprit with a hotplug cycle and ftrace with
trace_prempt_off and trace_preempt_on events (requires PREEMPT_TRACER
IIRC).
It's doable at boot time too, but that will mean sifting through many more
events than you'd like...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists