linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-binding: mediatek: mt6779: update spi document

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210625112544.GB4492@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 25 Jun 2021 12:25:44 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc:     Mason Zhang <mason.zhang@...iatek.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        wsd_upstream@...iatek.com, hanks.chen@...iatek.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:SPI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-binding: mediatek: mt6779: update spi document

On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 05:31:41PM +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> On 15/06/2021 13:14, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I don't have either patch 1 or a cover letter, what's the story with
> > dependencies here?

> No dependency. The dt-bindings was just send a second patch in the series. First
> one can be found here:

The point here is that if you're sending a series that's generally
because there's some dependencies so it's important to copy people on
enough of what's going on (generally at least the cover letter) so that
they know what the story is.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)