linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] perf arm-spe: Don't wait for PERF_RECORD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 25 Jun 2021 14:25:15 +0100
From:   James Clark <james.clark@....com>
To:     Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>, Al Grant <Al.Grant@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] perf arm-spe: Don't wait for PERF_RECORD_EXIT
 event



On 19/05/2021 08:19, Leo Yan wrote:
> When decode Arm SPE trace, it waits for PERF_RECORD_EXIT event (the last
> perf event) for processing trace data, which is needless and even might
> cause logic error, e.g. it might fail to correlate perf events with Arm
> SPE events correctly.
> 
> So this patch removes the condition checking for PERF_RECORD_EXIT event.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c | 6 +-----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c
> index 5c5b438584c4..58b7069c5a5f 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c
> @@ -717,11 +717,7 @@ static int arm_spe_process_event(struct perf_session *session,
>  					sample->time);
>  		}
>  	} else if (timestamp) {
> -		if (event->header.type == PERF_RECORD_EXIT) {
> -			err = arm_spe_process_queues(spe, timestamp);
> -			if (err)
> -				return err;
> -		}
> +		err = arm_spe_process_queues(spe, timestamp);
>  	}
>  
>  	return err;
> 

For the whole set:
Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Tested-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>

I see a big improvement in decoding involving multiple processes because the timestamps are now
correlated with the comm and mmap events.

For example perf-exec samples are visible right before the exec is done, and on an
application that forks, samples are visible from all processes. For example:

   perf record -e arm_spe// -- bash -c "stress -c 1"
   perf script

   perf-exec  4502 [003] 259755.050409:          1    l1d-access:  ffff80001014b840 sched_clock+0x40 ([kernel.kallsyms])
   perf-exec  4502 [003] 259755.050409:          1    tlb-access:  ffff80001014b840 sched_clock+0x40 ([kernel.kallsyms])
   perf-exec  4502 [003] 259755.050409:          1        memory:  ffff80001014b840 sched_clock+0x40 ([kernel.kallsyms])
   perf-exec  4502 [003] 259755.050411:          1    tlb-access:  ffff800010120fb8 __rcu_read_lock+0x0 ([kernel.kallsyms])
   bash  4502 [003] 259755.050411:          1   branch-miss:  ffff8000105b2a40 memcpy+0x80 ([kernel.kallsyms])
   bash  4502 [003] 259755.050411:          1    tlb-access:                 0 [unknown] ([unknown])
   ...
   stress  4502 [003] 259755.051468:          1    l1d-access:  ffff800010259a24 __vma_adjust+0x1f4 ([kernel.kallsyms])
   stress  4502 [003] 259755.051468:          1    tlb-access:  ffff800010259a24 __vma_adjust+0x1f4 ([kernel.kallsyms])
   stress  4502 [003] 259755.051468:          1        memory:  ffff800010259a24 __vma_adjust+0x1f4 ([kernel.kallsyms])

Previously samples were only attributed to 'stress', which was obviously wrong.

James