lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 25 Jun 2021 14:24:57 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@...eaurora.org>,
        lgirdwood@...il.com, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: qcom: lpass-cpu: mark IRQ_CLEAR register as volatile and readable

On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 10:21:53 +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> Currently IRQ_CLEAR register is marked as write-only, however using
> regmap_update_bits on this register will have some side effects.
> so mark IRQ_CLEAR register appropriately as readable and volatile.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: qcom: lpass-cpu: mark IRQ_CLEAR register as volatile and readable
      commit: 6a7f5bd6185e1c86256d5e52c3bb7a4d390d6e19

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ