[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <82fe02c8-2ac6-fc53-490c-382df3e07dc4@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:57:18 -0400
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] perf: Create a symlink for a PMU
On 6/25/2021 11:44 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
>> We have an attribute "caps/pmu_name" for the core PMU. Maybe we should
>> add it for uncore PMU as well. For example,
>>
>> $ cat /sys/devices/uncore_type_0_0/caps/pmu_name
>> cha_0
>>
>> Userspace tool can get clues about what type_0_0 is.
>
> It would break all the old tools, but I suppose it could work for
> updated tools.
>
Right, users have to update their perf tool to use the new name,
uncore_cha_0.
> It isn't only perf that is parsing this, but some other libraries too.
> They all would need to be updated too.
>
Yes, I will update the Documentation/ABI/ in V2 to indicate the changes.
If any other libraries are broken, they may get clues from the Document.
Thanks,
Kan
> I think I still prefer the symlink. It would just work and keep full
> compatibility.
>
> But yes maybe there is no choice.
>
> -Andi
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists