linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kunit: Fix merge issue in suite filtering test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:08:17 -0700
From:   Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kunit: Fix merge issue in suite filtering test

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 9:11 AM Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On 6/25/21 5:16 AM, David Gow wrote:
> > There were a couple of errors introuced when
> > "kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names"[1] was merged in
> > c9d80ffc5a.
> >
> > An erroneous '+' was introduced in executor.c, and the executor_test.c
> > file went missing. This causes the kernel to fail to compile if
> > CONFIG_KUNIT is enabled, as reported in [2,3].
> >
> > As with the original, I've tested by running just the new tests using
> > itself:
> > $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run '*exec*'
> >
> > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210421020427.2384721-1-dlatypov@google.com/
> > [2]: https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org/thread/6IKQX5JXZF7I3NFH4IAWUMHXEQSCPNDP/
> > [3]: https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org/thread/EKY7ZH5YDCCTSJF2G7XFPMGIXQSUVD3Y/
> >
> > Fixes: c9d80ffc5a ("kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names")
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
> > ---
> >
> > This is another fix for the kunit-fixes branch, where there seems to
> > have been an issue merging the "kunit: add unit test for filtering
> > suites by names" patch here:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/commit/?h=kunit-fixes&id=c9d80ffc5a0a30955de0b8c5c46a05906d417800
> >
> > Again, feel free to squash this into the original patch if that works
> > better.
> >
>
> Thank you. My bad. Applied to kunit-fixes now.

Hmm, it looks like executor_test.c might not have made it into kunit-fixes.
I believe this is the applied version of this patch:

$ git show d833ce7480864d4d7eb2dbb04320858be3578b2a --stat
commit d833ce7480864d4d7eb2dbb04320858be3578b2a
Author: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Date:   Fri Jun 25 04:16:03 2021 -0700

    kunit: Fix merge issue in suite filtering test
...
 lib/kunit/executor.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

The result looks like this:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run
...
$ make ARCH=um --jobs=8 O=.kunit
ERROR:root:../lib/kunit/executor.c:140:10: fatal error:
executor_test.c: No such file or directory
  140 | #include "executor_test.c"
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


I just `git am` or something just really doesn't like executor_test.c :)




>
>
>
> thanks,
>
> -- Shuah
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "KUnit Development" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kunit-dev+unsubscribe@...glegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kunit-dev/99c2564c-4175-7e3e-84c3-3bcb6d4f9d58%40linuxfoundation.org.