[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210625191658.1299-1-phil@philpotter.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 20:16:58 +0100
From: Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: Larry.Finger@...inger.net, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH] staging: rtl8188eu: remove rtw_wx_set_rate handler function
Remove rtw_wx_set_rate handler function, which currently handles the
SIOCSIWRATE wext ioctl. This function (although containing a lot of
code) set nothing outside its own local variables, and did nothing other
than call a now removed debugging statement repeatedly. Removing it and
leaving its associated entry in rtw_handlers as NULL is therefore the
better option. Removing this function also fixes a kernel test robot
warning.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>
---
.../staging/rtl8188eu/os_dep/ioctl_linux.c | 75 -------------------
1 file changed, 75 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/os_dep/ioctl_linux.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/os_dep/ioctl_linux.c
index b958a8d882b0..d4dce8ef0322 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/os_dep/ioctl_linux.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/os_dep/ioctl_linux.c
@@ -1262,80 +1262,6 @@ static int rtw_wx_get_essid(struct net_device *dev,
return 0;
}
-static int rtw_wx_set_rate(struct net_device *dev,
- struct iw_request_info *a,
- union iwreq_data *wrqu, char *extra)
-{
- int i;
- u8 datarates[NumRates];
- u32 target_rate = wrqu->bitrate.value;
- u32 fixed = wrqu->bitrate.fixed;
- u32 ratevalue = 0;
- u8 mpdatarate[NumRates] = {11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0, 0xff};
-
- if (target_rate == -1) {
- ratevalue = 11;
- goto set_rate;
- }
- target_rate /= 100000;
-
- switch (target_rate) {
- case 10:
- ratevalue = 0;
- break;
- case 20:
- ratevalue = 1;
- break;
- case 55:
- ratevalue = 2;
- break;
- case 60:
- ratevalue = 3;
- break;
- case 90:
- ratevalue = 4;
- break;
- case 110:
- ratevalue = 5;
- break;
- case 120:
- ratevalue = 6;
- break;
- case 180:
- ratevalue = 7;
- break;
- case 240:
- ratevalue = 8;
- break;
- case 360:
- ratevalue = 9;
- break;
- case 480:
- ratevalue = 10;
- break;
- case 540:
- ratevalue = 11;
- break;
- default:
- ratevalue = 11;
- break;
- }
-
-set_rate:
-
- for (i = 0; i < NumRates; i++) {
- if (ratevalue == mpdatarate[i]) {
- datarates[i] = mpdatarate[i];
- if (fixed == 0)
- break;
- } else {
- datarates[i] = 0xff;
- }
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
static int rtw_wx_get_rate(struct net_device *dev,
struct iw_request_info *info,
union iwreq_data *wrqu, char *extra)
@@ -2715,7 +2641,6 @@ static iw_handler rtw_handlers[] = {
IW_HANDLER(SIOCSIWESSID, rtw_wx_set_essid),
IW_HANDLER(SIOCGIWESSID, rtw_wx_get_essid),
IW_HANDLER(SIOCGIWNICKN, rtw_wx_get_nick),
- IW_HANDLER(SIOCSIWRATE, rtw_wx_set_rate),
IW_HANDLER(SIOCGIWRATE, rtw_wx_get_rate),
IW_HANDLER(SIOCSIWRTS, rtw_wx_set_rts),
IW_HANDLER(SIOCGIWRTS, rtw_wx_get_rts),
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists