[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YNiSyFNbAMVxN6wO@kroah.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 17:01:28 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] x86/tools/relocs: add __printf attribute to die()
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:07:28PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 01:38:51PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > 64-bit cross build on a 32-bit platform... or Windows.
>
> Meh, nobody cares about those... :)
>
> Hmm, so looking at the PRI* inttypes.h things again, they're C99 and
> they kinda look more elegant as they don't make us cast stuff.
>
> So how does that look?
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/tools/relocs.c b/arch/x86/tools/relocs.c
> index 04c5a44b9682..2582991ba216 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/tools/relocs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/tools/relocs.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ static struct relocs relocs32;
> #if ELF_BITS == 64
> static struct relocs relocs32neg;
> static struct relocs relocs64;
> +#define FMT PRIu64
> +#else
> +#define FMT PRIu32
> #endif
<snip>
This works for me! It should fix the static checking tool that keeps
tripping over this pointless warning :)
Want to turn it into a real patch?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists