lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 27 Jun 2021 08:29:40 -0700
From:   Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v4 0/4] perf stat: Enable BPF counters with --for-each-cgroup

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 12:18 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This is to add BPF support for --for-each-cgroup to handle many cgroup
> events on big machines.  You can use the --bpf-counters to enable the
> new behavior.
>
>  * changes in v4
>   - convert cgrp_readings to a per-cpu array map
>   - remove now-unused cpu_idx map
>   - move common functions to a header file
>   - reuse bpftool bootstrap binary
>   - fix build error in the cgroup code
>
>  * changes in v3
>   - support cgroup hierarchy with ancestor ids
>   - add and trigger raw_tp BPF program
>   - add a build rule for vmlinux.h
>
>  * changes in v2
>   - remove incorrect use of BPF_F_PRESERVE_ELEMS
>   - add missing map elements after lookup
>   - handle cgroup v1
>
> Basic idea is to use a single set of per-cpu events to count
> interested events and aggregate them to each cgroup.  I used bperf
> mechanism to use a BPF program for cgroup-switches and save the
> results in a matching map element for given cgroups.
>
> Without this, we need to have separate events for cgroups, and it
> creates unnecessary multiplexing overhead (and PMU programming) when
> tasks in different cgroups are switched.  I saw this makes a big
> difference on 256 cpu machines with hundreds of cgroups.
>
> Actually this is what I wanted to do it in the kernel [1], but we can
> do the job using BPF!

Ugh, I found the current kernel bpf verifier doesn't accept the
bpf_get_current_ancestor_cgroup_id() helper.  Will send the fix
to BPF folks.

Thanks,
Namhyung

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ