linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] sh: fixes for various build and kconfig warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 27 Jun 2021 15:30:49 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] sh: fixes for various build and kconfig warnings

On 6/27/21 3:26 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Randy!
> 
> On 6/28/21 12:05 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> Fix a few build warnings and one kconfig warning on SUPERH.
>>
>> v2: add a previously-sent Kconfig patch
>>     add a few more Cc's
>>
>> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
>> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
>> Cc: linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
>>
>> [PATCH 1/3 v2] sh: fix kconfig unmet dependency warning for FRAME_POINTER
>> [PATCH 2/3 v2] sh: define __BIG_ENDIAN for math-emu
>> [PATCH 3/3 v2] sh: fix READ/WRITE redefinition warnings
>>
>>  arch/sh/Kconfig.debug             |    1 
>>  arch/sh/include/asm/sfp-machine.h |    8 +++++
>>  arch/sh/math-emu/math.c           |   44 ++++++++++++++--------------
>>  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> I'll test these tomorrow on my SH-7785LCR board. Would it be possible to queue
> them up for linux-next after verification?

Thanks.  Hopefully they will be queued and put into linux-next,
but that's up to the arch/sh/ maintainers, and I haven't heard
from them lately.  :(

-- 
~Randy