lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210628144256.34524-31-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 28 Jun 2021 10:42:29 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Chen Li <chenli@...ontech.com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 30/57] radeon: use memcpy_to/fromio for UVD fw upload

From: Chen Li <chenli@...ontech.com>

[ Upstream commit ab8363d3875a83f4901eb1cc00ce8afd24de6c85 ]

I met a gpu addr bug recently and the kernel log
tells me the pc is memcpy/memset and link register is
radeon_uvd_resume.

As we know, in some architectures, optimized memcpy/memset
may not work well on device memory. Trival memcpy_toio/memset_io
can fix this problem.

BTW, amdgpu has already done it in:
commit ba0b2275a678 ("drm/amdgpu: use memcpy_to/fromio for UVD fw upload"),
that's why it has no this issue on the same gpu and platform.

Signed-off-by: Chen Li <chenli@...ontech.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
index b35ebabd6a9f..eab985fdcfbd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ int radeon_uvd_resume(struct radeon_device *rdev)
 	if (rdev->uvd.vcpu_bo == NULL)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	memcpy(rdev->uvd.cpu_addr, rdev->uvd_fw->data, rdev->uvd_fw->size);
+	memcpy_toio((void __iomem *)rdev->uvd.cpu_addr, rdev->uvd_fw->data, rdev->uvd_fw->size);
 
 	size = radeon_bo_size(rdev->uvd.vcpu_bo);
 	size -= rdev->uvd_fw->size;
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ int radeon_uvd_resume(struct radeon_device *rdev)
 	ptr = rdev->uvd.cpu_addr;
 	ptr += rdev->uvd_fw->size;
 
-	memset(ptr, 0, size);
+	memset_io((void __iomem *)ptr, 0, size);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.30.2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ